German academic communication in discourse practices: gender policy
https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2020-8-1-110-119
Abstract
This article focuses on gender discourse genesis in the context of both a new feminist movement and the emergence of feminist linguistics. The process of feminist linguistic theory conversion into the feminist social and political practices has also been revealed in the paper. German universities committed to all-European academic cultural tradition differed greatly from other European educational institutions by the number of women in the academic community. The low women representation in German academic environment is due to the following several factors:
- academic institutions do not compete with each other for future students;
- professionalization of science, achievements in scientific researches have caused the high status of a scientist in the German society, as well as the prestige of the academic career;
- the academic career has become attractive for social elites;
- the university boom has led to a dramatic increase of the number of female students and the number of women in the academic staff as well.
These have resulted in the re-evaluation of a woman’s place and role in the society including the language structures and reflected by the academic discourse practices and notably in the so called geschlechtsgerechte Sprache, i. e. “equity in languages” principles.
About the Authors
I. S. RedkovaRussian Federation
Irina S. Redkova - Cand. Sci. (History), Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages, Institute of Radioengineering and Telecommunication Systems
78, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow 119454
N. I. Chernova
Russian Federation
Nadezhda I. Chernova - Dr. Sci. (Pedagogical Sciences), Full Professor, Head of the Department of Foreign Languages, Insitute of Radioengineering and Telecommunication Systems
78, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow 119454
N. V. Katakhova
Russian Federation
Nataliya V. Katakhova - Cand. Sci. (Pedagogical Sciences), Associate Professor of the Department of Foreign Languages, Insitute of Radioengineering and Telecommunication Systems
78, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow 119454
References
1. Gladysheva E.V. Influence of moral values on the success of economic activity (on the example of domestic entrepreneurs of the XIX-XX centuries). Rossiiskii tekhnologicheskii zhurnal = Russian Technological Journal. 2017;5(4):67-76 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2017-5-4-67-76
2. Gritsenko E.S. Stanovlenie gendernoi lingvistiki v kontekste obshchego razvitiya nauki o yazyke (The formation of gender linguistics in context of the general development of the science of and language). Nizhnii Novgorod: NGLU Publishing House; 2007. 121 р. (in Russ.). ISBN 978-5-85839-162-3
3. Gritsenko E.S., Laletina A.O., Sergeeva M.V. Gender v angliiskoi lingvokul'ture. (Gender in English linguistic culture). Nizhnii Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod Dobrolyubov State Linguistic University; 2008. 214р. (in Russ.). ISBN 978-5-85839-181-4
4. Gritsenko S.A., Chernova N.I., Katahova N.V. Dialogue of cultures of russia and sweden in the context of formation of the world outlook of students. Rossiiskii tekhnologicheskii zhurnal = Russian Technological Journal. 2018;6(5):77-88 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2018-6-5-77-88
5. Kirilina AV. Gender. Lingvisticheskie aspekty. (Gender. Linguistic Apects). Moscow: Institute of Sociology RAS; 1999. 189 p. (in Russ.). ISBN 5-89697-42-0
6. Kirilina AV. Gendernye issledovaniya v lingvisticheskikh distsiplinakh. V kn. Gender i yazyk. (Gender Studies in Linguistics. In: Gender and Language). Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury; 2005. P. 7–31 (in Russ.).
7. Sidorova V.V. Humanities and society: are we in response? Sokrat = Socrates. 2016;5:80-5 (in Russ.).
8. Ausgaben, Einnahmen und Personal der öffentlichen und öffentlich geförderten Einrichtungen für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Entwicklung. Fachserie 11. Reihe 4.4. Bildung und Kultur. Personal an Hochschulen. 2019. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Hochschulen/Publikationen/DownloadsHochschulen/personal-hochschulen-2110440187004.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
9. Costas I. Women in Science in Germany. Science in Context. 2002;15(4):557-76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889702000649
10. Lakoff R. Language and women’s Place. Language in Society. 1973;2(1):45-79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500000051
11. Pusch L. Das Deutsch als Männersprache. Linguistische Berichte. 1981;69:59-74.
12. Samel I. Einführung in die feministische Sprachwissenschaft. Berlin, Schmidt Erich Verlag; 2000. 240 p. ISBN 3 503 04978 9
13. Trömel-Plötz S. Linguistik und Frauensprache. Linguistische Berichte. 1978;57:49-68.
14. Das Wortauskunftsystem zur deutschen Sprache in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Available from: https://www.dwds.de/
15. Orientirungshilfe für eine gerechte Gendersprache. An den Hochschulen im Land Bremen. Bremen, 2014. 22 s.
Supplementary files
|
1. Fig. 1. Dynamics of the use of the term Professorin-Professor (female) in the German language corpus [14]. | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(24KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
Review
For citations:
Redkova I.S., Chernova N.I., Katakhova N.V. German academic communication in discourse practices: gender policy. Russian Technological Journal. 2020;8(1):110-119. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2020-8-1-110-119