Trinitarian systems
https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2019-7-6-151-167
Abstract
The article explores the trinitarian systems used in the natural and technical sciences. Various types of trinitarian systems are considered. A systematic analysis of trinitarian systems was carried out. The article proves that the trinitarian system is the simplest complex system. The paper examines the relationship of trinitarian systems with the theory of categories. It is shown that the trinitarian system serves as the basis for categorical analysis. The paper proves that the trinitarian system is the simplest multigraph. The trinitarian system allows transforming spaces of different curvature into each other. The trinitarian system in linear systems defines a cyclicity, which can entail: development, degradation or bifurcation. Triangulation essentially develops a trinitarian approach and can be considered as the use of a trinitarian system to solve theoretical or technical problems in areas such as, for example, psychology, social sciences, politics, geometry, and ground surveying. The general conclusion is that the Trinitarian system is a universal instrument of cognition.
About the Authors
Stanislav A. Kudzh
MIREA – Russian Technological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Stanislav A. Kudzh, Dr. of Sci. (Engineering), Professor, Rector of the MIREA, Scopus Author ID 56521711400
78, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow 119454, Russia
Viktor Ya. Tsvetkov
MIREA – Russian Technological University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Viktor Ya. Tsvetkov, Dr. of Sci. (Engineering), Dr. of Sci. (Economics), Professor, Scopus Author ID 56069916700
78, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow 119454, Russia
References
1. McDonnell K. A Trinitarian Theology of the Holy Spirit? Theological Studies. 1985;46(2):191-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/004056398504600201
2. Grenz S.J. The social god and the relational self: A Trinitarian theology of the imago Dei. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001. 345 p.
3. Gunton C.E. The promise of trinitarian theology. A&C Black, 2003. 251 p.
4. Emery G. The Trinitarian Theology of St Thomas Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. 440 p.
5. Fokin A.R. Antique Philosophy and the Formation of Trinitarian Doctrine in Latin Patristics: Thesis ... of Doctor of Philosophy. M.: Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2013. 472 p. (in Russ.)
6. Kärkkäinen V.M. Trinity and Religious Pluralism: The Doctrine of the Trinity in Christian Theology of Religions. Routledge, 2017. 204 p.
7. Barantsev R.G. On Trinitarian Methodology. In: Philosophical Century. Almanac. Vol. 7. Between physics and metaphysics: science and philosophy. St. Petersburg, 1998. P. 51-61.
8. Barantsev R.G. System Triad: Structural Cell for Synthesis. Sistemnye issledovaniya. Yezhegodnik 1988 = Systems Research. Yearbook 1988. Moscow: Publishing house Nauka, 1989. P. 193-209. (in Russ.)
9. Stone J. Technology and War: A Trinitarian Analysis. Defense & Security Analysis. 2007;23(1):27-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14751790701254441
10. Oleynik A.N. Triangulation in content analysis. Methodology issues and empirical testing. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya = Sociological Stadies. 2009;2:65-79. (in Russ.)
11. Tsvetkov V.Ya. Triad as an interpretive system. Persektivy nauki i obrazovaniya = Perspectives of Science &Education. 2015;6(18):18-23/ (in Russ.) Available: psejournal.wordpress.com/archive15/15-06/
12. Papanikolaou A. Reasonable faith and a trinitarian logic: Faith and Reason in Eastern Orthodox Theology. In: Restoring Faith in Reason / eds. L.P. Hemming. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2002. P. 237–255.
13. Bubnov V.A. Logical operations of three-valued logic. Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Omsk State Pedagogical University. 2006. www.omsk.edu. Access date 10/12/2017 (in Russ.)
14. Jongsma C. Poythress’s Trinitarian Logic: A Review Essay // Pro Rege. 2014. V. 42. № 4. P. 6–15. Available at: https://digitalcollections.dordt.edu/pro_rege/vol42/iss4/2
15. Zhu Z. Trinitarian relation inquiry system in systems/management approaches? - More findings // in Sustainable Technology and Complex ecological and Social Systems, proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, July 19–24, Atlanta, Georgia, ISBN 0-9664183-0-1, eds., Allen, J. and Wilby, J., the last chapter
16. Cvetkov V.Ya. Trinitarian systems in management. Sovremennye tekhnologii upravleniya = Modern Management Technology. 2017;3(75):2-10. Available at: https://sovman.ru/en/article/7501/ ( in Russ.)
17. Opryatnaya O.N. Trinitarian approach as a methodological basis for complexity management. Sotsiologiya: metodologiya, metody, matematicheskoe modelirovanie = Sociology: Methodology, Methods, Mathematical Modeling. 2005;0(21):29-50. (in Russ.)
18. Calton P.M. Hegel’s Metaphysics of God: The Ontological Proof as the Development of a Trinitarian Divine Ontology. Ashgate Publishing, 2001. 140 p.
19. Ilman V.M. Algorithms for triangulation of plane regions along irregular networks of points. Algoritmy i programmy = Algorithms and Programs, VIEMS. 1985;10 (88): S. 3-35. (in Russ.)
20. Yusov E.A., Turlapov V.E. Adaptive terrain triangulation using the representation of quad trees by vertex textures and wavelet estimation of significance. Programming and Computer Software. 2008;34(5):245-256. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0361768808050010
21. Pekhterev V. V., Vishnyakov S. V., Tchobanou M. K. Adaptive Triangulation and Image Compression. Informatsionnye tekhnologii = Information technologies. 2013;5:41-46. (in Russ.)
22. Firago B.A. Cosmic triangulation by the method of astrometry of Earth satellites. Astronomicheskii zhurnal = Astronomy Reports. 1969;1-3:180-191. (in Russ.)
23. Verichev A.V., Fedoseev V.A. Protecting images with digital watermarks on a triangulation grid of characteristic points. In: Advanced Information Technologies and Scientific Computing (PIT 2013): Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. 2013. P. 92-96. (in Russ.)
24. Gaisin R.R., Nikiforova A.V., Kugurakova V.V., Sachenkov O.A. Method for threedimensional cross-platform visualization tomography data. Scientific and Technical Volga region Bulletin. 2013;4:137-139. (in Russ.)
25. Guseltseva M.S. Triangulation as a metaphorical construct: history and methodological perspectives. Voprosy psikhologii. 2014;5:3-14. (in Russ.)
26. Busygin B.S., Zatsepin E.P. The 3-D Triangulation Method in Problems of Cluster Analysis. Штучний інтелект. 2010;1:16-24.http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/56117
27. Tsvetkov V.Ya. Trinitarian systems. International journal of applied and fundamental research. 2016;11(3): 556-556. URL: https://applied-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=10539 (дата обращения: 06.12.2019). (in Russ.)
28. Bertalanffy L. von. General System Theory – A Critical Review. In: Research on the general theory of systems. M.: Progress Publ., 1969. P. 23-82. (in Russ.)
29. Volkova V.N., Denisov A.A. Fundamentals of systems theory and system analysis. SPb.: Publishing house of SPbGT, 2001. 512 p. (in Russ.)
30. Tsvetkov V.Ya. Solving problems using a systematic analysis. Perspektivy nauki i obrazovaniya = Perspectives of Science and Education. 2015;1(13):50-55. (in Russ.) http://www.pnojournal.wordpress.com/archive15/15-01/
31. Vizing VG, Toft B. The coloring of incidentors and vertices of an undirected multigraph. Diskretnyi analiz i issledovanie operatsii = Discretn. Anal. Issled. Oper. Ser. 1. 2001;8(3):3-14. (in Russ.)
32. Kuznetsov A.M. Network multigraph mathematical model and class hierarchy. Nauchno-issledovatel’skie publikatsii. = J. Scientific Research Publications. 2013:1:87-93. (in Russ.)
33. Mac Lane S. Categories for the working mathematician. Springer, 1998. 315 p.
34. Awodey S. Category Theory. Oxford Logic Guides. 49 (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, 2010. 328 р. ISBN 978-0-19-923718-0.
35. Wright S.E. From the semiotic triangle to the semantic web. Journal of the International Institute for Terminology Research. 2003;14:111-135.
36. Tsvetkov V. Ya. Not Transitive Method Preferences. Journal of International Network Center for Fundamental and Applied Research. 2015;3(1):34-42. https://doi.org/ 10.13187/jincfar.2015.3.34
37. Ozherelyeva T.A. Oppositional analysis of information models. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 2014;11(5):746-749. URL: https://applied-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=6219
38. Nomokonova O.Yu. Opposition method in the diagnosis. Slavyanskiy forum. 2016;3(13):207-211. (in Russ.)
39. Tsvetkov V.Ya. Opposition Variables as a Tool of Qualitative Analysis // World Applied Sciences Journal. 2014. 30 (11). P. 1703–1706. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.30.11.14237
40. http://outofthefog.website/top-100-trait-blog/2015/11/4/triangulation-divide-conquer
41. Cloud H., Townsend J. Boundaries with Kids: When to Say Yes, How to Say No. Zondervan, 2009. 270 p. ISBN 978 0310565666.
42. Abelin E. The role of the father in the separation-individuation process // in J.B. McDevitt, C.F. Settlage (eds.) Separation-individuation: essays in honor of Margaret S. Mahler. New York: International Universities Press, 1971. P. 229-252. ISBN 9780823660650.
43. Abelin E. The organizer and triangulation model. http://organisator-modell.org/wcms/ftp//o/organisator-odell.org/uploads/explicittable_of_contents_final_1.1.5_14-11-16.pdf.
44. Rothbauer P.M. Triangulation. In: Given L.M. (Ed.) The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Sage Publications, 2008. P. 892-894. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n468
45. Kudzh S.A., Tsvetkov V.Ya. Qualitative Reasoning: Monograph. M.: MAX Press Publ., 2017. 112 p. ISBN 978-5-317-05681-0. (in Russ.)
46. Denzin N.K. Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook. (5th Edn). Aldine Transaction, 2006. 600 p. ISBN 978-0-202-30840-1
47. Morris D. Behind the Oval Office: getting reelected against all odds (2th. ed.). Los Angeles: Renaissance Books, 1999. P. 80. ISBN 978-1580630535.
48. Goldberg J. Clintonian triangulation comes full circle. Los Angeles Times. December 18, 2007. Retrieved 29 December 2014.
49. Sanger D.E. Where Clinton Turned Right, Obama Plowed Ahea. The New York Times. 2010-01-29. Retrieved 2010-05-26
50. Geodesy, cartography, geoinformatics, cadastre: Encyclopedia. In 2th V. / Ed. A.V. Borodko, V.P. Savinykh. M.: LLC “Geodezkartizdat”, 2008. V. II. 464 p. (in Russ.)
51. Delaunay B. Sur la sphère vide. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Otdelenie Matematicheskikh i Estestvennykh Nauk. 1934;7:793-800. (in French).
Supplementary files
|
|
1. Fig. 1. Trinitarian system as a multigraph | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(25KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
Review
For citations:
Kudzh S.A., Tsvetkov V.Ya. Trinitarian systems. Russian Technological Journal. 2019;7(6):151-167. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2019-7-6-151-167
Views:
1072
Email this article 