Formation of a comprehensive approach to developing the scientific and educational infrastructure of a modern engineering university
https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2026-14-2-134-145
EDN: BYDBUX
Abstract
Objectives. The work sets out to develop a comprehensive approach to grounding decisions aimed at advancing the scientific and educational infrastructure of an engineering university. This includes selecting modernization policies for the scientific and educational infrastructure, substantiating the format of scientific and educational infrastructure objects in light of the diversity of current tasks, involving industry partners in implementing infrastructure policies, as well as addressing resource support issues using mathematical formalization and analytical evaluation tools.
Methods. Methods of systems and strategic analysis, comparison and formalization, modeling and statistical indicators, as well as change management, risk assessment, and strategy actualization approaches, were used.
Results. Ensuring the contribution of modern engineering universities to technological leadership is an ambitious task that requires a focused approach to the development of scientific and educational infrastructure. One effective solution consists in the creation of specialized laboratories, or mega-laboratories, which are considered as an optimal format for the scientific and educational infrastructure. Such laboratories combine educational, research, and communication zones, along with their respective advantages and typologies. The importance of collaboration with industry partners in driving innovation, helping to ensure that educational programs, research, and development align with market needs, is demonstrated. A mathematical model is developed for evaluating projects associated with the establishment of a mega-laboratory based on a comprehensive system of indicators. This model was used to formalize the procedure for selecting and financing of newly created scientific and educational infrastructure.
Conclusions. Infrastructure constraints defined at the state level in the context of technological development and the need to ensure technological independence are becoming a key challenge for engineering universities. This necessitates the development of tools for seeking, justifying, and making managerial decisions. The described comprehensive approach takes into account current requirements for scientific and educational infrastructure facilities, including a high degree of integration between education and science, and the involvement of industry partners in the development process in order to bridge the gap between education, science, and the demands of the real economy. The formulated recommendations and proposed solutions effectively address the issues faced by modern engineering universities within development programs.
About the Authors
S. A. KudzhRussian Federation
Stanislav A. Kudzh, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Rector, Professor, Department of Instrumental and Applied Software, Institute of Information Technologies
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
N. B. Golovanova
Russian Federation
Natalia B. Golovanova, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, Deputy First Vice-Rector, Professor, Department of Economics, Institute of Management Technologies
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Yu. G. Grafov
Russian Federation
Yuri G. Grafov, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Vice Rector (Digital Transformation and Finance)
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
1. Opletina N.V. Engineering Education in the Context of a New Technological Paradigm of Social Development. Naukovedcheskie issledovaniya = Science Studies. 2022;2:55–70 (in Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/uizigx
2. Zhmud V.A. Modern Problems of Higher Technical Education. Avtomatika i programmnaya inzheneriya = Automation and Software Engineering. 2021;2(36):20–47 (in Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/cqymyg
3. Kiryushina N.A. Modern Engineering Education: Problems and Prospects. Innovatsionnoe razvitie professional’nogo obrazovaniya = Innovative Development of Vocational Education. 2024;3(43):70–77 (in Russ.). https://www.elibrary.ru/jeqcwg
4. Prokhorov V.A. Problems of lifelong learning in the field of engineering. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: ХХI vek = Lifelong Education: The 21st Century. 2019;4(28) (in Russ.). http://doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2019.5156
5. Sobolev L.B. Problems of engineering education in Russia. Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika = Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice. 2017;17(7):1252–1267 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.17.7.1252
6. Sharipov F.F. Management of educational and scientific laboratory: new requirements and competences. E-Management. 2020;3(1):36–42 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-3445-2020-1-36-42
7. Giryuk I.A., Varkulevich T.V. On the Issue of the Need to Improve the Sphere of Information and Logistics Support for the System of Higher Education in the Russian Federation. Molodoi uchenyi = Young Scientist. 2023;10(457):138–142 (in Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/adkoqo
8. Vzaimodeistvie vuzov s industrial’nymi partnerami (Interaction between Higher Education Universities and their Partners). V. 10. Moscow: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics; 2022, 132 p. (In Russ.).
9. Shtykhno D.A., Petrov A.M. Interaction between Higher Education Universities and their Partners. Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ehkonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii (Nauchnye trudy VEHO Rossii) = VEO of Russia Today. 2023;243(5):85–97 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2023-243-5-85-97
10. Boyko E.A., Pikolova A.A. Strategic Interaction of University with Industrial Partners. Professional’noe obrazovanie v Rossii i za rubezhom = Professional Education in Russia and Abroad. 2022;4(48):51–58 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.54509/22203036_2022_4_51
11. Skvortsov N.I., Pavlov N.S., Ermilov V.G. Features of Implementation of Financial Policy in the Field of Higher Education. Vestnik MGPU. Seriya Ehkonomika = MCU Journal of Economic Studies. 2023;1(35):37–51 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25688/2312-6647.2023.35.1.03
12. Meliksetyan S.N., Otrishko M.O. Development of Extra budgetary Sources for the Financing for Higher Education Institutions. Finansovye issledovaniya = Financial Research. 2020;3(68):92–97 (in Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/tszgmr
13. Kasharnaya G.B., Naidenova L.I. Prinyatie upravlencheskikh reshenii (Management Decision-Making). Penza: PSU Publ.; 2020, 68 p. (In Russ.).
14. Konova T.A., Nesterov V.L. Estimation of the efficiency of use of material-technical base of universities in the system of indicators of the quality of training. Fundamental’nye issledovaniya = Fundamental Research. 2015;3:187–191 (in Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/tniqxf
15. Shkuropat A.V. Composite Indices as a Tool for Regional Development Policy. Rossiiskii vneshneekonomicheskii vestnik = Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin. 2021;6:58–69 (in Russ.). https://elibrary.ru/rkrotb
- A comprehensive approach to grounding decisions aimed at advancing the scientific and educational infrastructure of an engineering university was developed.
- The importance of collaboration with industry partners in driving innovation, helping to ensure that educational programs, research, and development align with market needs, was demonstrated.
Review
For citations:
Kudzh S.A., Golovanova N.B., Grafov Yu.G. Formation of a comprehensive approach to developing the scientific and educational infrastructure of a modern engineering university. Russian Technological Journal. 2026;14(2):134-145. https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2026-14-2-134-145. EDN: BYDBUX
JATS XML


























