EFFECT OF PHASE-SHIFT INTERFERENCE ON THE NOISE IMMUNITY OF CORRELATION DEMODULATOR OF SIGNALS WITH MULTIPLE PHASE SHIFT KEYING

The energy and spectral advantages of signals with phase shift keying predetermined their widespread use in modern digital navigation, communications and television systems. The use of such signals is the base of communication standards of DVB-S, DVB-S2 / S2X, GLONASS, CDMA, WiFi IEEE 802.11 and others. To increase the capacity of radio channels, multiple phase shift keying (MPSK) is applied. This increases the number of possible phase states of the signal and, thus, the information capacity of the channel symbol. However, such an increase greatly affects the noise immunity of MPSK signal reception. In the article the noise immunity of receiving signals with multiple phase shift keying in the presence of noise and phase-shift interference is analyzed by the methods of statistical radio engineering. The dependencies of bit error probability on the signal-to-noise ratio, on the interference intensity, on the relative transmission speed of the interference, and on its detuning relative to the center frequency of the spectrum of the useful signal are calculated. It is shown that signals with multiple phase shift keying are very strongly influenced by phase-shift interference, and this influence increases with increasing signal positionality. The degree of reduction of the noise immunity of the reception depends on the magnitude of the relative transmission rate of the interference and its intensity. The damaging effect of the phase-shift interference is most pronounced when it hits the main lobe of the signal spectrum. As the relative transmission rate increases, the interference becomes more broadband and pseudo-noise, and it affects even with very large frequency detuning somewhat decreasing in the region of the main lobe of the signal spectrum. This decrease seems natural, since the analyzed algorithm for receiving MPSK signals is optimal for the effects of noise interference.

1. Proakis J. Digital communications. Ed. Klovsky D.D. Moscow: Radio i Svyaz' Publ., 2000. 800 p. (in Russ.)

2. Bocker P. Transmission of data. Communication techniques in data teleprocessing systems: in 2 volumes. V I. Basics. Ed. Klovsky D.D. Moscow: Svyaz’ Publ., 1980. 264 p. (in Russ.).

3. Varakin L.E. Communication system with noise-like signals. Moscow: Radio i Svyaz' Publ., 1985. 384 p. (in Russ.).

4. Borisov VI., Zinchuk V.M., Limarev A.E., Mukhin N.P., Shestopalov V.I. Noise immunity of radio communication systems with spreading of the signal spectrum by the method of pseudo-random adjustment of the operating frequency. Moscow: Radio i Svyaz’ Publ., 2000. 384 p. (in Russ.)

5. Kulikov G.V. Analysis of the influence of a pseudo-random phase-shift interference on the noise immunity of a correlation signal demodulator with a minimum frequency shift keying. Radiotekhnika i electronika (Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics). 2002; 47(8): 973-976. (in Russ.)

6. Galev A.V, Kosolapov A.S. Research of influence of smart jamming on error probability of direct-sequence spread-spectrum systems at coherent reception. Nauka i obrazobanie (Science and Education). 2012; 4: 77-30569/400050 (15 p.) (in Russ.)

7. Alekseev A.A., Chuchin E.V Models of quality of reception of signals in the conditions of white noise and influence of structural hindrances. Uchenye zapiski (Scientific notes): The online academic journal of Kursk State University. 2012; 1: 70-79. (in Russ.). URL: http://www.scientific-notes.ru/index.php?page=6&new=23

8. Maltsev G.N., Travkin VS. Optimal reception of complex phase-manipulated signals in satellite channels under internal structural noise. Informatsionno-upravliayuschie sistemy (Information and Control Systems/ 2006; 5: 36-42. (in Russ.)

9. Ivanov M.S., Fedoseev VE. Technique and results of the analysis of the potential noise stability of reception of the digital signal against the manipulated structural hindrance. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta (Bulletin of Voronezh State Technical University). 2010; 6(11): 108-112. (in Russ.)

10. Lozhkin K.Yu., Stitsenko A.I. The immunity of non-coherent and coherent reception of a signal DQPSK in the conditions of influence of PSK, harmonic or Gaussian noise. Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal'nogo Universiteta (Journal of Siberian Federal University. Engineering & Technologies). 2017; 10(2): 260-270. (in Russ.)

11. Kulikov G.V, Nguyen Van Dung, Nesterov A.V., Lelyukh A.A. Noise immunity of reception of signals with multiple phase-shift keying in the presence of harmonic interference. Naukyomkie tekhnologii (Science Intensive Technologies). 2018; 11: 32-38. (in Russ.)

12. Kulikov G.V., Nguyen Van Dung. Analysis of noise immunity of reception of signals with multiple phase shift keying under the influence of scanning interference. Rossiyskiy tekhnologicheskiy zhurnal (Russian Technological Journal). 2018; 6(6): 5-12. (in Russ.)

13. Petrov E.P., Petrov I.E., Abaturov S.G. Protecting mobile receivers with noise-like signals from powerful and harmonic interference. T-Comm. 2010; 4: 21-25. (in Russ.)

14. Petrov E.P., Aleshkin E.A. Method of suppression of signal-similar interference with unknown amplitude and time delay in communication systems with noise-shaped signals. T-Comm. 2016; 10(11): 34-39. (in Russ.)

15. Akimov P.S., Bakut P.A., Bogdanovich V.A. [et al.] Signal detection theory. Ed. Bakut P.A. Moscow: Radio i Svyaz' Publ., 1984. 440 p. (in Russ.)

16. Avdeev V.V., Parshin Yu.N., Minaeva I.A. Efficiency of the digital compensator for powerful non-Gaussian interference. Radiotekhnika (Radio Engineering). 1984; 8: 3335. (in Russ.)

17. Ivanov M.S., Fedoseev VE. Technique and results of the analysis of the potential noise stability of reception of the digital signal against the manipulated structural hindrance. Vestnik Voronezhskogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Voronezh Technical University). 2010; 6(11): 108-112. (in Russ.).

18. Ivanov M.S., Fedoseev V.E. Synthesis of the demodulator with optimum indemnification of the structural faltering hindrance. Vestnik Voronezhskogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Voronezh Technical University). 2010; 6(10): 91-95. (in Russ.)