Industrial revolutions: From Industry 3.0 to Industry 5.0 in the context of the Russian economy

Objectives. The study set out to substantiate the principles of Industry 5.0 as a necessary development for the classical model of economic growth proposed by Solow. An adapted and expanded Solow model is presented that takes into account technological progress, as well as social and environmental aspects, which influence long-term development and economic growth in the context of the Russian economy.

Methods. The main results of the work are obtained through a comparative analysis of the distinctive features of Industry 3.0, Industry 4.0, and Industry 5.0 in the context of an extended Solow model and an expert survey to assess the factors influencing economic growth.

Results. Inorder tosubstantiate the necessity oftransition tomore promising models ofproduction and development, the main distinguishing features of Industry 3.0, Industry 4.0, and Industry 5.0, are shown to be determined by unique orientations, technologies, objectives, approaches to working with data, and types of interfaces. The Russian economy is shown to be insufficiently prepared for the challenges of Industry 5.0. The principles of Industry 5.0 apply to such factors of the Solow economic growth model as labor, capital, and technological progress, as well as human capital, natural resources, and the current technological level. A survey of experts was conducted to assess the contribution of factors to production processes. The extended Solow model is a convenient tool for developing specific economic policy strategies based on the analysis of the interrelated factors.

Conclusions. The transition to Industry 4.0 technologies and subsequent planning for the implementation of Industry 5.0 technologies are necessary steps prior to the creation of an innovative and competitive economy. The conducted expert survey exemplified the different contributions of various factors to Industry 5.0 production processes, including a decrease in the role of capital and labor, along with a concomitant increase in the importance of human capital, technological development, and natural resources. This transition is evidenced by the presented numerical values for the Solow model coefficients for Industry 3.0, Industry 4.0, and Industry 5.0. Such Industry 5.0 priorities not only do not contradict economic growth, but can be expected to enhance it in the long term.

1. Sitnikova S.E. Digital form of commercialization of innovations in universities and ways to improve its efficiency: international experience and prospects for Russia. Innovatsionnoe razvitie ekonomiki = Innovative Development of Economy. 2020;6(60):61–70 (in Russ.).

2. Starozhuk I.N., Komissarov V.D. Digital twin as a mechanism for transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0. In: Digital Transformation of Economic Systems: Problems and Prospects: Proceedings of the 6th All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with Foreign Participation. St. Petersburg: POLITEKh-PRESS; 2022. P. 151–154 (in Russ.).

3. Ageev A.I. Managing the digital future. Mir novoi ekonomiki = The World of New Economy. 2018;12(3):6–23 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2018-12-3-6-23

4. Rozanova N.M. Industry 5.0: a golden age or a leap into the dark? Vestnik Instituta ekonomiki Rossiiskoi akademii nauk = Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023;6:61–77 (in Russ.).

5. Barata J., Kayser I. Industry 5.0 – Past, Present, and Near Future. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2023;219(1):778–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.351

6. Nahavandi S. Industry 5.0 – A Human-Centric Solution. Sustainability. 2019;11(16):4371. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164371

7. Orea-Giner A., Fuentes-Moraleda L., Villacé-Molinero T., et al. Does the Implementation of Robots in Hotels Influence the Overall TripAdvisor Rating? A Text Mining Analysis from the Industry 5.0 Approach. Tour. Manag. 2022;93(2):104586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104586

8. Kaasinen E., Anttila A.H., Heikkilä P., et al. Smooth and Resilient Human–Machine Teamwork as an Industry 5.0 Design Challenge. Sustainability. 2022;14(5):2773. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052773

9. Coronado E., Kiyokawa T., Ricardez G.A.G., et al. Evaluating quality in human-robot interaction: A systematic search and classification of performance and human-centered factors, measures and metrics towards an industry 5.0. J. Manufactur. Syst. 2022;63:392–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.04.007

10. Carayannis E.G., Christodoulou K., Christodoulou P., et al. Known Unknowns in an Era of Technological and Viral Disruptions – Implications for Theory, Policy, and Practice. J. Knowl. Econ. 2022;13(1):587–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00719-0

11. Fatima Z., Tanveer M.H., Waseemullah, et al. Production Plant and Warehouse Automation with IoT and Industry 5.0. Appl. Sci. 2022;12(4):2053. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12042053

12. Paul G., Abele N.D., Kluth K. A Review and Qualitative Meta-Analysis of Digital Human Modeling and Cyber-PhysicalSystems in Ergonomics 4.0. IISE Trans. Occup. Ergon. Hum. Factors. 2021;9(3–4):111–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2021.1966130

13. Broo D.G., Kaynak O., Sait S.M. Rethinking engineering education at the age of industry 5.0. J. Industr. Inform. Integrat. 2021;25(8):100311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100311

14. Alvarez-Aros E.L., Bernal-Torres C.A. Technological competitiveness and emerging technologies in industry 4.0 and industry 5.0. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 2021;93(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202120191290

15. Gasanov E.A. New form of human-machine connection in the Industry 5.0 production model. Ekonomika i upravlenie innovatsiyami = Economy and Innovation Management. 2022;3(22):39–49 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26730/2587-5574-2022-3-39-49

16. Trofimova N.N. Industry 5.0 as a new direction of industrial development. Ekonomika i Upravlenie: Problemy, Resheniya. 2023;5(133):24–28 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2023.01.05.003

17. Evgenev G.B. Industry 5.0 as an integration of the Internet of Knowledge and the Internet of Things. Ontologiya proektirovaniya = Ontology of Designing. 2019;9(1–31):7–23 (in Russ.).

18. Azieva R.Kh., Taimaskhanov H.E. Modernization of the oil and gas industry in the style of Industry 5.0. Finansovyi biznes. 2021;2(212):82–86 (in Russ.).

19. Galimulina F.F., Shinkevich M.V. Diagnostics of mesoeconomic systems in Russia under condition of transition to Industry 5.0. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’no-gumanitarnye issledovaniya = Economic and Social Research. 2023;4(40):23–32 (in Russ.).

20. Tingting Hu. Review of national strategies for transition to Industry 5.0. Ekonomika i upravlenie innovatsiyami = Economics and Innovation Management. 2022;3(22):28–38 (in Russ.). https://dx.doi.org/10.26730/2587-5574-2022-3-28-38

21. Makovetskii S.A. Continued evolution: comparison of Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 in the context of modern requirements. In: Business. Education. Economy: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical conference. Minsk; 2023. P. 81–85 (in Russ.).

22. Pronin A.Yu. Tendencies in digital transformation of high-tech enterprises in the transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0. Cifra. Ekonomika = Cifra. Economy. 2024;3(6) (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.60797/ECNMS.2024.6.1

23. Cherepanov N.V. Principles and approaches of using Industry 5.0 at the enterprise. Innovatsii i investitsii = Innovation & Investment. 2019;9:144–147 (in Russ.).

24. Lapaev D.N., Mityakova O.I., Murashova N.A., Mityakov E.S. Organizatsiya NIOKR (Organization R&D). N. Novgorod: Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University; 2017. 100 p. (in Russ.).

25. Kanametova D.A. Analysis of Models of Dynamic Economic Systems. Izvestiya Kabardino-Balkarskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN = News of the Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2023;4(114):88–97 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.35330/1991-6639-2023-4-114-88-97

26. Memon M., Ting H., Hwa C., Ramayah T., Chuah F., Cham T.H. Sample Size for Survey Research: Review and Recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling (JASEM). 2020;4(2):i-xx. http://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01