Semantic features of complex technosocial systems: On the taxonomy of artificial intelligence technological packages
https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2023-11-6-89-98
Abstract
Objectives. The aim ofthis work is to enhance the scientific and methodological apparatus of artificial intelligence (AI) sciences by enriching their conceptual framework. The current conceptual framework of AI sciences does not reflect the intricate nature of this technological and socioeconomic phenomenon as possessing the diverse range of capabilities and the interconnectedness that allows for the imitation of human cognitive functions and comparable results. The author of the article structures the concept of the technological package of AI, describing its system properties, connections and functional elements based on the various types of human cognitive and operational activities.
Methods. The research is based on the concept (method) of technological packages—genetically and functionally connected sets of technologies with system properties.
Results. For the first time in Russian and international practice, the basic (general) taxonomy of the AI technological package has been specified and structured. A taxonomy of the AI metatechnological package (a package of metatechnologies) has been proposed. General taxonomy can serve as a tool for improving strategies, methodological documents and state programs to define the development of AI systems at state or industry level.
Conclusions. The suggested basic (general) taxonomy oftechnological package and taxonomy of metatechnologies package allows research to move away from the limited view of AI. It increases semantic and methodological clarity in relation to AI as a complex technosocial phenomenon and contributes to the harmonized integration of AI systems intо the sphere of socioeconomic activities of the state. It can thus serve as a foundation for further improvement of state economic and legal regulation of AI development.
About the Author
S. I. Dovguchits
VNII Center;
MIREA – Russian Technological University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Sergey I. Dovguchits, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, General Director; Head of the Department “Mathematical Support for Information Systems”, Institute of Information Technologies; Honored Economist of the Russian Federation, Full Member of the Russian Academy of Missile and Artillery Sciences, Member of the Marine Board under the Government of the Russian Federation.
11-1, Sadovaya–Kudrinskaya ul., Moscow, 123242;
78, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119454
Competing Interests:
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
References
1. Saveliev A., Zhurenkov D. Artificial intelligence and social responsibility: the case of the artificial intelligence strategies in the United States, Russia, and China. Kybernetes. 2021;50(3):656–675. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2020-0060
2. Floridi L. AI as Agency Without Intelligence: on ChatGPT, Large Language Models, and Other Generative Models. Philos. Technol. 2023;36(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00621-y
3. Arnetz B.B. Technological stress: psychophysiological aspects of working with modern information technology. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health. 1997;23(Suppl. 3):97–103. Available from URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40966711
4. Zagvyazinsky V.I., Strokova T.A. Resistance to innovation: essence, ways of prevention and overcoming. Obrazovanie i nauka = The Education and Science J. 2014;1(3):3–21 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2014-3-3-21
5. Floridi L., Cowls J., Beltrametti M., et al. AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations. Minds & Machines. 2018;28:689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
6. Dubrovsky D.I., Efimov A.R., Lepsky V.E., Slavin B.B. The fetish of artificial intelligence. Filosofskie nauki = Russ. J. Philosophic. Sci. 2022;65(1):44–71 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2022-65-1-44-71
7. Zheltov A.O. Concept of technological package. Innovatsii = Innovations. 2007;12:48–52 (in Russ.).
8. Skrylnikova N.A. Managing innovation processes on the basis of the concept of technological package. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika = Tomsk State University J. of Economics. 2010;4(12): 52–58 (in Russ.). Available from URL: https://www.lib.tsu.ru/mminfo/000063105/ec/12/image/12-052.pdf
9. Malakhova E. Axiology of Technology – on the way to human dimension of complex technical systems. Voprosy Filosofii. 2022;10:218–222 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2022-10-218-222
10. Pereslegin S.B., Yutanov N.Yu. Stsenirovanie tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya. Chast’ 1. Stsenarii tekhnologicheskogo razvitiya. Metodologiya neizbezhnogo budushchego i evolyutsiya sovremennykh tekhnologicheskikh paketov (Science and Technology Development Scenarios. Part 1. Technology Development Scenarios. “The Unavoidable Future.” Scenario-Building Methodology and Evolution of Technological Packages). Moscow: Kurchatov Institute; 2009. 48 p. (in Russ.). ISBN 978-5-9900-9966-1
11. Nikitin V.A., Pereslegin S.B. Inzhenernaya ontologiya. Inzheneriya kak stranstvie (Engineering Ontology. Engineering as Wandering). Ekaterinburg: Azhur; 2013. 631 p. (in Russ.). ISBN 978-5-9125-6156-6
12. Desai J., Watson D., Wang V., et al. The epistemological foundations of data science: a critical review. Synthese. 2022;200:469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03933-2
13. Mökander J., Sheth M., Watson D.S., et al. The Switch, the Ladder, and the Matrix: Models for Classifying AI Systems. Minds & Machines. 2023;33:221–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-022-09620-y
14. Orlov D.E., Orlova N.A. Autopoiesis of Techno-Social Systems as a Factor of Social Risks Proliferation. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Sotsiologiya = RUDN J. Sociology. 2015;15(2):59–68 (in Russ.). Available from URL: https://journals.rudn.ru/sociology/article/viewFile/6456/5909?ysclid=ln1ec44hj3506917384
15. Pohl J. Artificial Superintelligence: Extinction or Nirvana? In: Proceedings for InterSymp-2015, IIAS, 27th International Conference on Systems Research, Informatics, and Cybernetics (InterSymp-2015). 2015. Available from URL: https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/arch_fac/82/
16. Efimov A.R. Post-turing methodology: destruction of the wall on the way to general artificial intelligence. Intellekt. Innovatsii. Investitsii = Intellect. Innovations. Investments. 2020;2:74–80 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25198/2077-7175-2020-2-74
17. Luhmann N. Vvedenie v sistemnuyu teoriyu (Introduction to Systems Theory). Transl. from German. Мoscow: Logos; 2007. 360 p. (in Russ.). ISBN 978-5-8163-0076-6
18. Anokhin P.K. Methodological Significance of Cybernetic Laws. In: Materialisticheskaya dialektika i metody estestvennykh nauk (Materialistic Dialectics and Methods of Natural Sciences). Мoscow: Nauka; 1968. P. 547–587 (in Russ.).
Supplementary files
|
|
1. AI in the space of the meta-technological connections | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(64KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
- The study aims to enhance the scientific and methodological apparatus of artificial intelligence (AI) sciences by enriching their conceptual framework.
- The author structures the concept of the technological package of AI, describing its system properties, connections and functional elements based on the various types of human cognitive and operational activities.
- It is shown that general taxonomy can serve as a tool for improving strategies, methodological documents and state programs to define the development of AI systems at state or industry level.
Review
For citations:
Dovguchits S.I. Semantic features of complex technosocial systems: On the taxonomy of artificial intelligence technological packages. Russian Technological Journal. 2023;11(6):89-98. https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2023-11-6-89-98
Views:
344
Email this article 