Analysis and evaluation of the effectiveness of methods for ensuring the quality of service for software-defined networks of the standard 5G/IMT-2020
https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2021-9-5-14-25
Abstract
The quality of service (QoS) in networking is the process of managing network resources to reduce packet loss and to lower network jitter and latency. QoS has been widely used in traditional network and can also be implemented in the 5G standard based on a software-defined network (SDN). A traditional network carries several challenges, such as vendor dependency, the complexity of managing a large network, dynamically changing forwarding policies, and more. Software-defined networking is a new networking strategy designed to address the challenges of a traditional IP network, such as high levels of complexity and inability to adapt to the new quality of service requirements in a timely manner. The fundamental idea behind SDNs compared to the conventional networking paradigm is the creation of horizontally integrated systems through the separation of the control and the data plane while providing an increasingly sophisticated set of abstractions. Recently, various SDN-enabled QoS frameworks have emerged that offer many possibilities for network reconfiguration and high-level definition of policies. QoS requirements for 5G networks have been defined on the basis of three main categories of use cases: extreme mobile broadband (xMBB), massive machine type communications (mMTC) IoT/M2M devices, and highly reliable М2М-communication (ultra-reliable machine-type communications – uMTC). This paper analyzes and surveys the QoS based on the openflow protocol method and QoS based on open-source SDN controllers method in 5G network. In addition, we discuss various architectural issues of open-source SDN controllers network and examine their impact on the QoS. Furthermore, we outline the characteristics of the QoS parameters such as latency, availability, reliability, jitter, and bandwidth in the 5G network. Finally, the article discusses and compares parameters of the QoS in 5G determined by world’s leaders in 5G technology.
About the Author
Behrooz Daneshmand
TMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Behrooz Daneshmand, PostgraduateStudent, Faculty of Infocommunication Technologies
49−A, Kronverkskii pr., St. Petersburg, 197101
References
1. View on 5G Architecture – 5G-PPP. Version 3.0. Available from URL: https://5g-ppp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/5G-PPP-5G-Architecture-White-Paper_v3.0_PublicConsultation.pdf
2. Keshari S.K., Kansal V., Kumar S. A systematic review of quality of services (QoS) in software defined networking (SDN). Wireless Personal Communications. 2021;116(3):2593−2614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07812-2
3. Moravejosharieh A.H., Lloret J. Performance analysis of quality of service in software-defined networking. Network Protocols and Algorithms. 2019;10(4):1. https://doi.org/10.5296/npa.v10i4.14054
4. Nam Tuan Le, Arif Hossain M., Islam A., Do-yun Kim, Young-June Choi, Yeong Min Jang. Survey of promising technologies for 5G networks. Mobile Information Systems. 2016; Article ID 2676589. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2676589
5. OpenFlow. OpenFlow Switch Specification. Version 1.5.0. 2014. Available from URL: https://opennetworking.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/openflow-switch-v1.5.0.pdf
6. Fernandez M.P. Comparing openflow controller paradigms scalability: reactive and proactive. In: Proc. IEEE 27th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA). 2013, p. 1009−1016. https://doi.org/10.1109/AINA.2013.113
7. Masoudi R., Ghaffari A. Software defined networks: A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. 2016;67:1−25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.03.016
8. McKeown N., Anderson T., Balakrishnan H., Parulkar G., Peterson L., Rexford J., Shenker S., Turner J. OpenFlow: Enabling innovation in campus networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review. 2008;38(2):69−74. https://doi.org/10.1145/1355734.1355746
9. Karakus M., Durresi A. Quality of service (QoS) in software defined networking (SDN): A survey. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. 2017;200−218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.12.019
10. Paliwal M., Shrimankar D., Tembhurne O. Controllers in SDN: A Review Report. IEEE Access. 2018;6:36256−36270. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2846236
11. Salman O., Elhajj I.H., Kayssi A., Chehab A. SDN controllers: A comparative study. In: 2016 18th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON). 2016, p. 1−6. https://doi.org/10.1109/MELCON.2016.7495430
12. Wibowo F.X.A., Gregory M.A., Ahmed K., Gomez K.M. Multi-domain software defined networking: Research status and challenges. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. 2017;87:32−45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.03.004
13. Zhang Y., Cui L., Wang W., Zhang Y. A survey on software defined networking with multiple controllers. Journal of Network and Computer Applications. 2018;103:101−118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.11.015
14. Karakus M., Durresi A. A survey: Control plane scalability issues and approaches in Software-Defined Networking. Computer Networks. 2017;112(7):279−293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2016.11.017
15. Singh A.K., Srivastava S. A survey and classification of controller placement problem in SDN. International Journal of Network Management. 2018;28(2):e−2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/nem.2018
16. OpenDaylight Project. Available from URL: https://www.opendaylight.org
17. ONOS Project. Available from URL: http://onosproject.org
18. Floodlight Project. Available from URL: https://floodlight.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/HOME/overview?mode=global
19. Scenarios, requirements and KPIs for 5G mobile and wireless system. ICT-317669-METIS/D1.1. May 2013. Available from URL: https://cordis.europa.eu/docs/projects/cnect/9/317669/080/deliverables/001-METISD11v1pdf.pdf
20. Banovic-Curguz N., Ilisevic D. Mapping of QoS/QoE in 5G networks. In: Proc. 2019 42nd International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO). 2019, p. 404−408. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2019.8757034
21. 5G-PPP. 5G Vision. The 5G infrastructure public private partnership: The next generation of communication networks and services. Available from URL: https://5g-ppp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/5G-Vision-Brochure-v1.pdf
22. Concept of creation and development of 5G/IMT-2020 networks in the Russian Federation. (in Russ.). Available from URL: https://digital.gov.ru/uploaded/files/kontseptsiya-sozdaniya-i-razvitiya-setej-5g-imt-2020.pdf
23. 5G Americas. Network Slicing for 5G Networks and Services. Available from URL: https://www.5gamericas.org/network-slicing-for-5g-networks-services/
24. IMT-2020 (5G) Promotion Group and 5G PPP Announce Memorandum of Understanding for 5G. Available from URL: https://5g-ppp.eu/imt-2020-5g-promotion-group-and-5g-ppp-announce-memorandum-of-understanding-for-5g/
25. 5G Vision and Requirements of 5Gforum. Available from URL: https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itur/oth/0a/06/R0A0600005F0001PDFE.pdf
26. 5GMF White Paper. 5G Mobile Communications Systems for 2020 and Beyond. Available from URL: https://5gmf.jp/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/5GMF_WP101_All.pdf
27. Mohandas R., Aravindhar D.J. An intelligent dynamic bandwidth allocation method to support quality of service in internet of things. International Journal of Computing. 2021;20(2):254−261.
28. Hind S., Najib E.K., Fatima L. Towards QoS enhancement in wireless network through SDN. In: 2019 7th Mediterranean Congress of Telecommunications (CMT). 2019, p. 1−5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CMT.2019.8931396
Supplementary files
|
|
1. SDN levels and functions | |
| Subject | ||
| Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(47KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ | |
A traditional network carries several challenges: the vendor dependency, complexity of managing a large network, dynamically changing forwarding policies. Software-defined networking is a new networking strategy designed to address these challenges. We discuss various architectural issues of open-source SDN controllers network and examine their impact on the QoS.
Review
For citations:
Daneshmand B. Analysis and evaluation of the effectiveness of methods for ensuring the quality of service for software-defined networks of the standard 5G/IMT-2020. Russian Technological Journal. 2021;9(5):14-25. https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2021-9-5-14-25
Views:
727
Email this article 