Analytical expressions for electrodynamic parameters of the shielded microstrip line
https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2021-9-4-68-76
Abstract
On the basis of an electrodynamic model of a screened microstrip line, built on the basis of the projection method using the Chebyshev basis, which explicitly takes into account the edge features of the field, a mathematical model of a microstrip line with a strip conductor was developed. The line width does not exceed the height of the substrate. In this case, the current density on the strip conductor is approximated by only one basis function. Analytical expressions are presented in the form of a sum of slowly and rapidly converging series to determine the main electrodynamic parameters of the line – wave resistance and deceleration coefficient. Due to logarithmic features, slowly converging series are summed up and transformed into rapidly converging power series. In addition, limit expressions in the form of improper integrals are given for the main electrodynamic parameters of an open microstrip line in the quasi-static approximation. Due to the logarithmic features, these integrals are also converted to rapidly converging power series. As a result, simple approximate formulas were obtained. They allow calculating the deceleration coefficient and wave impedance of the line with an error not exceeding 1%, when the width of the strip conductor is less than twice the thickness of the substrate. The results of calculating the electrodynamic parameters obtained on the basis of the developed mathematical model and on the basis of the projection method with an accuracy of up to 5 significant digits are presented. These results make it possible to establish the limits of applicability of the quasi-static approximation and to determine the error in calculating the deceleration coefficient and wave resistance using the obtained analytical expressions. The error does not exceed 0.1%, if the width of the strip conductor is less than twice the thickness of the substrate in a wide range of changes in the substrate dielectric constant and frequency.
About the Authors
A. N. KovalenkoRussian Federation
Alexander N. Kovalenko, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Department of Radio Wave Processes and Technologies, Institute of Radio Engineering and Telecommunication Systems
78, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119454
A. D. Yarlykov
Russian Federation
Alexey D. Yarlykov, Assistant, Department of Radio Wave Processes and Technologies, Institute of Radio Engineering and Telecommunication Systems
78, Vernadskogo pr., Moscow, 119454
References
1. Kovalenko A.N. Natural modes of a microstrip line. Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics. 1978;21(2):128−133. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078702 [Kovalenko A.N. Sobstvennye volny mikropoloskovoi linii. Izvestiya vuzov. Radiofizika = Radiophysics and Quantum Electronics. 1978;21(2):188−194 (in Russ.).]
2. Kovalenko A.N. Projection method for constructing fullwave models of striplines. Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics. 2019;64(2):93−99. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064226919020128 [Kovalenko A.N. Proektsionnyi metod postroeniya elektrodinamicheskikh modelei poloskovykh linii. Radiotekhnika i elektronika = Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics. 2019;64(2):108−115 (in Russ.).]
3. Alexeev P.P., Kirillina E.V. Review of the application and improvement of microstrip lines. In: Proc. of the XV International scientific conference. The strategies of Modern Science Development. May 16–17, 2018. USA North Charleston, p. 65−69.
4. Kovalenko A.N., Kozlov A.Yu. To the calculation of the joint of microstrip lines. In: Avtomatizirovannoe proektirovanie ustroistv SVCh: Mezhvuzovskii sbornik nauchnykh trudov (Computer-Aided Design of Microwave Devices: Interuniversity collection of scientific papers). Moscow: MIREA; 1988, p. 21−40. (in Russ.).
5. Kirschning M.K., Jansen R.H. Accurate model for effective dielectric constant of microstrip with validity up to millimetrewave frequencies. Electronics Letters. 1982;18(6):272–273. https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19820186
6. Jansen R.H., Kirschning M.K. Arguments and an accurate model for the power-current formulation of microstrip characteristic impedance. Arch Elek Ubertragung. 1983;37(3/4):108−112.
7. Kotov E.P., Kaplun V.D., Ter-Markaryan A.A. Poloskovye platy i uzly. Proektirovanie i izgotovlenie (Strip boards and assemblies. Design and manufacture). Moscow: Sovetskoe Radio; 1979. 248 p. (in Russ.).
8. Gupta K.C., Garg R., Chadha R. Computer-aided Design of Microwave Circuits. Dedham, Mass., Artech House Inc.; 1981. 636 p. [Gupta K., Gardzh R., Chadkha R. Mashinnoe proektirovanie SVCh ustroistv (Machine design of microwave devices). Moscow: Radio i svyaz’; 1987. 432 р. (in Russ.).]
9. Bakharev S.I., Vol’man V.I., Lib Yu.N., et al. Spravochnik po raschetu i konstruirovaniyu SVCh poloskovykh ustroistv (Handbook for the calculation and design of microwave stripline devices). Moscow: Radio i svyaz’; 1982. 328 p. (in Russ.).
10. Priyanka K., Anupma M., Manpreet S.M. Optimized design of shielded microstrip lines using adaptive finite element method. In: Excerpt of the Proceedings of the 2011 COMSOL Conference in Bangalore. 2011. Available from URL: https://www.comsol.fr/paper/download/84093/riyanka_paper.pdf
11. Peric Ć.M., Ilić S., Aleksić S. Quasi-TEM analysis of multilayered shielded microstrip lines using hybrid boundaty element method. In: Engineering Mathematics I. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics. 2016. V. 178, p. 115−129. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42082-0_8
12. Musa S.M., Sadiku M.N.O. Quasi-static analysis of shielded microstrip lines. Excerpt of the Proceedings of the COMSOL Users Conference 2006 Las Vegas. 2006. Available from URL: https://www.comsol.dk/paper/download/100951/Musa.pdf
13. Pantoja J.P., Hernandez-Figueroa H.E., Savu R., Canesqui M.A., Moshkalev S.A. Performance comparison of metallic and graphene buckypaper microstrip transmission lines. In: SBMO/IEEE MTT-S International Microwave and Optoelectronics Conference. 2017, p. 1−5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMOC.2017.8121104
14. Gradshtein I.S., Ryzhik I.M. Tablitsy integralov, summ, ryadov i proizvedenii (Tables of integrals, sums, series and products). Moscow: Fizmatgiz; 1963. 1100 p. (in Russ.).
15. Tsyba E.A., Golubeva I.P., Kazimirenko V.A., Prokopenko Y.V. Complex effective dielectric permittivity of micromechanically tunable microstrip lines.Radioelectronics and communications systems. 2018;61(2):72−79. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0735272718020048 [Tsyba E.A., Golubeva I.P., Kazimirenko V.A., Prokopenko Yu.V. Kompleksnaya effektivnaya dielektricheskaya pronitsaemost’ mikromekhanicheski perestraivaemykh mikropoloskovykh linii. Izvestiya VUZov. Radioelektronika = Radioelectronics and communications systems. 2018;61(2):96−107 (in Russ.).]
Supplementary files
|
1. Cross-section of the microstrip line | |
Subject | ||
Type | Исследовательские инструменты | |
View
(36KB)
|
Indexing metadata ▾ |
On the basis of an electrodynamic model of a screened microstrip line, built on the basis of the projection method using the Chebyshev basis, which explicitly takes into account the edge features of the field, a mathematical model of a microstrip line with a strip conductor was developed. These results make it possible to establish the limits of applicability of the quasi-static approximation and to determine the error in calculating the deceleration coefficient and wave resistance using the obtained analytical expressions. The error does not exceed 0.1%, if the width of the strip conductor is less than twice the thickness of the substrate in a wide range of changes in the substrate dielectric constant and frequency.
Review
For citations:
Kovalenko A.N., Yarlykov A.D. Analytical expressions for electrodynamic parameters of the shielded microstrip line. Russian Technological Journal. 2021;9(4):68-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2021-9-4-68-76